The availability of artificial intelligence and the widespread prevalence of AI-generated songs and covers has not only brought significant changes to the music industry but has also sparked controversy. As AI continues to blur the lines between genuine and synthetic creativity, fans are finding it increasingly challenging to distinguish between songs crafted by human musicians and those produced by machine learning models. With an estimated 1,630,000 AI covers currently on YouTube alone, this technological takeover has begun to raise concerns about the authenticity of music, whether human creativity is important, and the financial implications on artists.
Concerningly, studies have found that 2 in 3 Americans cannot recognise the use of AI in creating or completing music compositions [1], underscoring the increasing sophistication of AI’s ability to replicate human artistry. As such, many high-profile musicians, such as Billie Eilish, Nicki Minaj and the estates of Frank Sinatra and Bob Marley, have begun to view AI as a threat to jobs and artistic integrity and an “assault on human creativity” [2]. Many fear substantial revenue losses as AI-generated tracks flood the market, often mimicking popular styles and voices.
To understand the scale of threat and revenue loss, musicMagpie conducted a comprehensive analysis of 1,500 AI-generated covers and songs to understand the amount of streams, number of videos, and the popularity of particular AI artists. The findings revealed that some of the industry's biggest names are significantly affected, with AI-generated tracks amassing millions of streams and effectively syphoning off potential earnings from the original creators.